Thread: A popular but weak hadith for iftar

Hmm ok.Where u got this info from ??

Please see Daeef AbuDawud by Sheykh Albani (hadith no. 510 )

Sheykh Albani hmm.the one who removed sahih Ahadeeths from Aladab almufrad of Imam Muhammad bin Ismail Bukhari Rehmatullah Taala Alai.i.e Imam Bukhari

Listen to this about nasir ud din albani

YouTube - wahhabi Muhaddith Nasir-ud-Din Albani aqeedah on Bukhari by Tahir ul Qadri 1/2

Brother Wahaj, u should not hate a scholar unless u have deep knowledge of islam, and u should not be trapped by those who always try to earn cheap fame by deafaming great scholars. I ask u a simple questn. Will u hate einstein because he proved that issac newton made some mistakes!

No one follows einstein in islam.So what ever he said or disagreed to .All of that has no effect on muslims or their thoughts.
But the mentioned scholar by u .... what should i say ??? the lecture says it all.
Removing hadiths that r not according to ur faith ???
What is that ??
A good thing or bad thing ???

As i said earlier, u must not base ur opinion on some deceitful lecture. Now u may ask how can a person b accused of deciving. My answer is: that first u must hav sound understanding of islam then u wil b able to coment some scholar. As for Shekh Albani (r.a.), he removed thousands of weak ahadeeth of many scholars, not only those of Imam Bukhari (r.a.). And he did not do so due to his liking, rather he removed ahadith according to science of hadith. And as for Imam Bukhari (r.a.), he was not infallible like any other person, and many later experts of hadith have pointed out some weak ahadith narrated by Imam Bukhari (r.a.), so Albani (r.a) is not alone to hav done so.. Now if u want to follow truth, i think this information is enough.

My Question Please : the Hadith U Had Posted May I Know Is It Of Prophet Muhammad Sallahualai-wa-sallam?????

Why is that ??? That he only removed the hadiths which were agianst the wahabbi faith ?
The problem with the wahabbis(Ghair Muqalids) is that they call each and every hadith Weak which they consider to be against their faith.
U should have a sound knowledge about science of hadith as u r calling one lecturer deceitful and other (Albani) the righteous one ?
Or u have just read the books of albani and made up ur mind as to the status of albani ?
On one hand u people say that Bukhari Bukhari........ and when something goes aginst u people then its weak .Why is that so ????
Did albani posess more knowledge of science of hadith that he willfully removed the hadith that Imam bukhari collected in Sahih bukhari ??